Legal Opinion

Richer v. Poisson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 1995No. 92-CV-0436-TM; CA A83923Published

1Opinion of the Court

903 P.2d 932 (1995)

137 Or. App. 157

Lee RICHER and Yvonne Richer, husband and wife, Appellants,

v.

Lawrence POISSON, Respondent.

92-CV-0436-TM; CA A83923.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted February 1, 1995.

Decided October 11, 1995.

Michael Henderson, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellants.

Robert L. Nash, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dunn, Carney, Allen, Higgins & Tongue.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint for failure to state a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rogers v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API