Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1911No. 9160PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered March 11, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian run down by an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, C. J.

In the afternoon of October 2, 1908, while the respondent was crossing Third avenue, one of the main prominent thoroughfares in the city of Seattle, near its inter*378section with James street, he was run over by an automobile driven by one Maloney, who was superintendent of the street department of the city of Seattle, and received the injuries of which he complains. At the time of the accident, Maloney was in the performance of his duty as such superintendent. In his complaint, after stating the facts, respondent alleges negligence bn the part of the city through its agent Maloney, and that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Missano v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. Jones v. City of WilliamsburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Howard v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bradshaw v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API