Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Atchison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 18, 1926No. 4812PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating

the facts as above). The ease is presented in this court on the single contention that there was total absence of evidence sufficient in law to prove a prescriptive right in the defendant to use the plaintiff’s land for discharging thereon drainage waters through the culvert; the plaintiff asserting that no prescriptive right begins to run until a right of action accrues, and that no right of action accrues until injury is inflicted. The evidence indicates with reasonable certainty that from the year 1887 until the date of the injury here complained of winter floods caused…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hesperia Land & Water Co. v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Groff v. AnkenbrandtIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Eells v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Central, Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  2. Corby v. RamsdellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Reinsch v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Hargraves v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Corby v. RamsdellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API