Legal Opinion
Painters District Council No. 3 Pension Fund v. Johnson
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided June 15, 1983No. 78-0558-CV-W-4-9PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARTLETT, District Judge.
Pursuant to § 301 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and § 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132, three employee benefit funds seek payment of allegedly unpaid contributions and other related relief. There is no dispute that the plaintiffs are employee benefit funds as defined by ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (2), and that the defendant engaged in business affecting commerce within the meaning of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151 and 185.
On July 5, 1973, Painters District Council No. 3…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jim McNeff, Inc. v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- International Association of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local Union No. 103, Afl-Cio v. Higdon Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. John Tinney Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Ion Construction v. District Council of Painters No. 16District Court, N.D. California · 1984
- Teamsters Pension Trust Fund Of Philadelphia And Vicinity v. John Tinney Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.