Ion Construction v. District Council of Painters No. 16
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AGUILAR, District Judge.
The general rule in labor-management relations is that a union and an employer may not enter into an agreement until a majority of the employees in a unit have selected the union as their exclusive bargaining agent. Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 157, grants employees the right to choose their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining. Section 9(a) of the Act provides that the bargaining representative for the employees in a unit must be the representative “designated or selected for the purposes of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jim McNeff, Inc. v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sheet Metal Workers International Association Local 110 Pension Trust Fund v. Dane Sheet Metal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catalytic Industrial Maintenance Co. (Cimco)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- John S. Griffith Construction Co. v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters & Joiners Of Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mesa Verde Construction Co. v. Northern California District Council of LaborersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Ion Construction Co. v. District Council of Painters No. 16Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.