Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2007No. 2005-SC-000479-MRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Justice McANULTY.

On March 22, 2005, Daniel Cummings (Appellant) pleaded guilty to fifty-three charged offenses which consisted of multiple counts of rape, sodomy, and burglary, in addition to related charges of burglary, robbery, illegal use of a credit card and kidnapping. The charges were listed in three separate indictments that were ultimately consolidated, and included offenses ranging in time from February 1998 through August 2002. 1 Appellant appeals as a matter of right, arguing that his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Travis v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. McCloud v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Phon v. Com. of Ky.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Chavies v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API