Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hupman v. Erskine College

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 1984No. 22059Published

1DissentHarwell, Justice

In this Court’s decision abrogating the doctrine of charitable immunity, we stated, “it is time to once and for all lay this anachronism to rest.” Fitzer v. Greater Greenville, S. C. Young Men’s Christian Ass’n, 277 S. C. 1, 282 S. E. (2d) 230, 231 (1981). Yet, again, this antiquated doctrine rears its ugly head, and my brethren allow it to breathe a few last gasps before its inevitable death. I would hold that Fitzer applies retroactively to the extent of the previously immune organization’s insurance coverage.

This Court did not hold in Fitzer that the decision was to apply prospectively…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elam v. ElamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Hyder v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Fitzer ex rel. Fitzer v. Greater Greenville South Carolina Young Men's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Anderson County Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. King v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API