In re Pravda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department, moves for an order confirming the findings of fact and conclusions of law of a hearing panel, and directing that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.
Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Department on March 16,1966, and has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Department.
On or about February, 1977, respondent was retained to probate an estate. After letters testamentary were issued to him on May 26, 1977, respondent…
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re RabinowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re LeavittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re AlejandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re LeBowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.