Legal Opinion

Austin v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 16, 1988No. CA CR 88-115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The appellant was convicted in non-jury trial of theft by receiving property allegedly valued in excess of $2,500.00 in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-2206 (Repl. 1977), now codified at Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-106 (1987). On appeal, the only issue is the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

In a criminal case, the test is whether there is substantial evidence to support the verdict and, on appeal, it is only necessary to view the evidence which is most favorable to the State in determining whether there is substantial evidence. Clark v. State, 15 Ark. App. 393, 695…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Core v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Westbrook v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Mason v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  4. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. Biniores v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SizemoreNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Doubleday v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. McCullough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API