Legal Opinion

McCullough v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1993No. CA CR 93-157PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melvin Mayfield, Judge.

Clarence McCullough was convicted in a bench trial of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and sentenced as a habitual offender to twenty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal he argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that the judge erred in sentencing him as a habitual offender.

In Harris v. State, 284 Ark. 247, 681 S.W.2d 334 (1984), the Arkansas Supreme Court held that when, there is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we must review that point prior tó considering any alleged trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Tisdale v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Ryan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API