Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1946No. Civ. 12745PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an action wherein appellant seeks to recover from respondent, as constructive trustee, certain funds, originally the property of Lulu H. Coffin, deceased, placed by said Lulu H. Coffin, formerly Lulu H. Montgomery, in joint *501tenancy with plaintiff, Chas. A. Bliss. The appeal is presented in the form of a bill of exceptions with a stipulation to the effect that the evidence, minute orders, etc., contained therein, are true and correct.

The bill of exceptions contains the following: “Plaintiff was duly sworn and testified that he was the plaintiff in said action; that he was an attorney…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Scafidi v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fish v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Williams v. BinkleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Beck v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Daniels v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Helmer v. HelmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API