Legal Opinion

Fizz v. Kurtz, Dowd & Nuss, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1987No. 693PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from an Order sustaining defendant/appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to appellant’s complaint.

Appellant brought this action against appellees after his decedent/wife was struck and killed by an automobile operated by B. Bollinger, who later pled guilty to numerous criminal offenses, including driving while intoxicated. Bollinger admitted that immediately prior to the accident he had been drinking at an establishment which was covered by an insurance policy that had been issued by appellees acting as agents of the Fireman’s Fund…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Gordon v. Lancaster Osteopathic Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Scarpitti v. WeborgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Barnum v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Werrmann v. Aratusa, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. Denlinger, Inc. v. AgrestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API