Legal Opinion

Glosemeyer v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 10, 1988No. 86-2508C(6)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

685 F.Supp. 1108 (1988)

Maurice and Dolores GLOSEMEYER, et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

No. 86-2508C(6).

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri.

May 10, 1988.

Ronald R. McMillin, Carson, Coil, Riley, McMillin, Levine & Veit, Jefferson City, Mo., Kemper Coffelt, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Henry D. Menghini, Evans & Dixon, St. Louis, Mo., for M-K-T.

Edward F. Downey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Mo., for Brunner & DNR.

Leland B. Curtis, Harold Bamburg, St. Louis, Mo., Charles H. Montange, Washington, D.C., for intervenors.

John J. Rademacher,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. Preseault v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992
  4. Wittmann v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1994
  5. Glosemeyer v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API