Legal Opinion

Klauber Brothers, Inc. v. Lady Marlene Brassiere Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 10, 1968No. 67 Civ. 4679PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

The plaintiff, a converter of laces, has brought this copyright infringement action claiming infringement of three copyrighted designs by both defendants and, additionally, the infringement of a design patent by the defendant Acme Laces, Inc. (Acme). Until recently the defendant Lady Marlene Brassiere Corp. (Marlene), presently a customer of Acme, was a valued customer of plaintiff. Acme, like the plaintiff, is a converter of laces dealing, allegedly, in lower priced merchandise.

The issues before this Court are presented by plaintiff’s motion for threshold injunctive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Thomas Wilson & Co. v. Irving J. Dorfman Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Santos v. BonannoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  4. Veterans of Foreign Wars v. Durable Outfitters, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Dow Jones & Co. v. Bd. of Trade of City of ChicagoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Gianni Cereda Fabrics, Inc. v. Bazaar Fabrics, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  5. Encyclopaedia Britannica Educational Corp. v. CrooksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API