Legal Opinion

State v. Mayor of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On certiorari. Argued at November Term, 1891, before Justices Dixon, Reed and Garrison.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

This certiorari brings, under review proceedings taken by the mayor and common council of the city of Newark, in pursuance of the act of March 17th, 1891 (Pamph. L., p. 172), to condemn lands of the prosecutor “for the purpose of laying down and constructing and maintaining a pipe line or lines” to be used in supplying said city with water for public use.

The first objection which the prosecutor urges against these proceedings is, that the act does not purport to confer any power of condemnation, but merely prescribes how existing powers shall…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Mayor v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Ten Broeck v. . SherrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Clendaniel v. ConradSupreme Court of Delaware · 1912
  2. City of Tacoma v. Nisqually Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Wise v. Yazoo CityMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dallas v. HallockOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Inhabitants of Whiting v. Inhabitants of LubecSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API