Legal Opinion

Bloedel v. Zimmerman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1894No. 4977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Sarpy county. Tiled' below before Clarkson, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, C. J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error, AgnesBloedel, Matilda Bloedel, and Alexander Bloedel, by Amelia Bloedel, their next friend, against John Zimmerman and several saloon-keepers in the village of Papillion, and the sureties on their liquor bonds, to recover damages for injury to the plaintiffs’ means of support resulting from the selling to their father of intoxicating liquors. The petition, after alleging that the plaintiffs are the minor children of Andrew Bloedel, the execution and delivery of the bonds sued on, and the issuing and delivery of the licenses to the principals…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kerkow v. BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Wanzer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Levi v. FredNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kirkendall, Jones & Co. v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. MasonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Vale v. School District of City of SuperiorNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gravely v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Phœnix Insurance v. KingNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Quinn v. MossNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API