People v. Grant
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, Acting P. J.
Appellant stands convicted after a jury trial of three violations of Health and Safety Code section 11352, selling or offering to sell heroin. His defense was entrapment. Appellant contends the instructions on entrapment misled the jury in that they suggested that he must be found to be “a normally law-abiding person” before he could be found to have been entrapped. We reject the contention and affirm the judgment.
The facts are as follows.
Appellant sold approximately one gram of heroin to Clovis Police Officer Charles Maxwell for $200. One week later, he sold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BarrazaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Pascu v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SellersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. SellersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bigelow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bigelow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989