United States v. Paul Lash (90-1449), Richard Tommasi (90-1450), Lawrence Dresner (90-1451), and Carol Ross (90-1500)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Paul Lash (“Lash”), Richard Tommasi (“Tommasi”), and Lawrence Dres-*1080ner (“Dresner”) appeal from their April 6, 1990, judgments of conviction and sentences for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendant Carol Ross (“Ross”) appeals from her April 26, 1990, judgment of conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. (All defendants will be collectively referred to as “defendants.”) For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment and sentence of each defendant.
I
A
In the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- De La Beckwith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.