Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Lash (90-1449), Richard Tommasi (90-1450), Lawrence Dresner (90-1451), and Carol Ross (90-1500)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1991No. 90-1449 to 90-1451 and 90-1500PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Paul Lash (“Lash”), Richard Tommasi (“Tommasi”), and Lawrence Dres-*1080ner (“Dresner”) appeal from their April 6, 1990, judgments of conviction and sentences for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendant Carol Ross (“Ross”) appeals from her April 26, 1990, judgment of conviction and sentence for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. (All defendants will be collectively referred to as “defendants.”) For the following reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment and sentence of each defendant.

I

A

In the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. United States v. Thomas S. Ross and John ColloriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. De La Beckwith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Desmond v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API