Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Business Men's Protective Ass'n

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1930No. 29,055PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action on what is commonly known as an accident insurance policy. The jury answered special questions and returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed, and complains that the court erred in giving certain instructions, in excluding evidence offered, and in refusing to grant a new trial.

*701The plaintiff is the beneficiary named in the policy and was the wife of Raymond R. Richardson, to whom the policy was issued. The insured sustained injuries by accident which resulted in his death. The policy was in full force at that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foley v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Murphy v. Ludowici Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Mabee v. Continental Casualty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Rambo v. Empire District Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. State v. GuthridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. State v. SevernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. The People v. SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Miller v. KruggelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API