Legal Opinion

Mountain Refining Co. v. Heald

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 14, 1944No. 15,267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter designated as Mountain and Apex, and defendants in error as Heald and Cheesman, respectively.

Heald sued to recover approximately $1,700 and interest on four of nineteen notes executed by Mountain, and to foreclose as a mortgage a “deed of trust” on approximately eleven acres of land in Tp. 3 S., R. 68 W., and a certain refinery thereon located consisting of buildings, machinery, fixtures and equipment given to secure said notes. She further alleged that seven of said notes, aggregating approximately $3,400, were held by Cheesman, made a defendant because it…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bakers Park Mining & Milling Co. v. District Court ex rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. BAKERS PARK MIN. & MILL. v. Dist. CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. First Peoples National Bank v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API