Legal Opinion

Kealamakia, Inc. v. Kealamakia

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 4, 2009No. 20070922-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Judge:

[ 1 Defendants Nadine Kealamakia and Joseph Kealamakia appeal the trial court's judgment in favor of Plaintiff Kealamakia, Inc. Defendants argue that the trial court erred by awarding attorney fees, by not determining whether the attorney fees awarded were reasonable, by allowing a double recovery of prejudgment interest, and by failing to appoint a disinterested third-party to calculate the prejudgment interest. Plaintiff cross-appeals, contending that its contingency fee agreement with its attorneys should not be the maximum amount it may receive as an attorney fee…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ClearOne Communications, Inc. v. Biamp SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Burdick v. Horner Townsend & Kent, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Holladay v. StoreyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. Lavender v. FCOI PreserveCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API