Hirsch v. Ashford
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.
This,suit grows out of a collision of automobiles at a street intersection. Plaintiff claims, by original petition, $570.97, and defendant, by reconventional demand, $148.85.
There was judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand and in favor of defendant as prayed for on his reconventional demand and plaintiff has appealed.
Only two witnesses, plaintiff and defendant, testified concerning the accident. As might be expected, they do not agree. The trial judge gave more weight to the evidence of defendant, and we cannot say he was manifestly in error.
We find the facts to be as follows:
Plaintiff during…
2Cited by8 opinions
- McMahon v. HalsallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hamilton v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bethancourt v. BayhiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Smyth v. Hill Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.