Legal Opinion

Clark v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 7, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, P. J.

Action for personal injuries bottomed upon the alleged violation of the Federal Safety Appliance Act. The issues, however, for our determination have been much simplified by admission made by learned counsel for appellant. Plaintiff was the head brakeman on his train, and his position (when the train was moving) was upon the engine. He ivas required to inspect, at each stop, the running gear (under the cars), for hot boxes, trouble in the brake rigging and such things about the under-equipment of the car. The rear brakeman had a like duty, and it appears that they would leave their respective…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Frese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Davis v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ConartySupreme Court of the United States · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern v. Chesapeake & Gulf Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Krueger v. WaltersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Davis v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Cass v. Pacific Fire Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API