Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corp. v. Ram Distribution, LLC
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided December 16, 2008No. 06-CV-1247PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) filed suit against defendants Ram Distribution, LLC and Anthony Boldin (“defendants”) asserting that defendants infringed Microsoft’s copyrights and trademarks, violated the Lanham Act by falsely designating the origin of software and/or related components, and engaged in unfair competition. Microsoft now brings this motion for summary judgment as to defendants’ liability on all of its claims. Microsoft also seeks an award of statutory damages under both the Copyright Act and the Lanham Act, costs and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara Payne v. Michael PauleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Knitwaves, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lollytogs Ltd. (Inc.) D/B/A French Toast, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Larry D. Drake and Rosalie E. Drake v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dwyer Instruments, Inc. v. Sensocon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
- 1-800 CONTACTS, INC. v. Lens. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2010
- White v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010