Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1975No. 6997PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue in this case is whether defendant may be convicted of being an accomplice to theft under RSA ch. 637 on the complaint brought against him. The district court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and the questions of law raised thereby were transferred by Shovan, J., on an agreed statement of facts.
The complaint charged defendant with “Theft of Services” in that he was “purposely an accomplice to theft of services in that he did aid and assist Kevin Reilly in the removal of a 1960 V/W sedan ... from the custody and control of Main Street Texaco Inc., New London, while the said Kevin…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hogan v. Robert H. Irwin Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Associates Financial Services Co. v. O'DellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Growe v. George Lussier Enterprises, Inc. (In re Achorn)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1991