Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Williams v. City Court of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 9, 1974No. 2 CA-CIV 1513PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
Appellee Cohen was charged in City Court with a violation of the following ordinance :
“Sec. 11-33. Loitering.
A person is guilty of loitering when he: (1) Loiters, remains or wanders about in a public place for the purpose of begging
The city magistrate sustained the appel-lee’s attack on the constitutionality of the subject ordinance, ruling that it suffered from vagueness and overbreadth, and dismissed the complaint. This ruling was upheld by the superior court in a special action instituted by appellant, hence this appeal.
The court’s findings below that this…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Chicago v. MoralesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Lambert v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- In Re Rusty Nail Acquisition, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.