Legal Opinion

In Re Blesso

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 7, 2005No. 19-50196Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING DENYING TRUSTEE’S MOTION TO COMPROMISE CLAIM

ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

Before the court is the motion (“the motion”) of John J. O’Neil, Jr., Esq. (“the trustee”), the trustee in the Chapter 7 joint case of Paul Blesso (“Paul”) and Sheri Lynn Blesso (“Sheri”) (together, “the debtors”) to approve a settlement between the trustee and Ameriquest Mortgage Company (“Ameriquest”). The following background is based upon representations made by the trustee in the motion and at the motion hearing, and the case file.

II

BACKGROUND

The debtors, on June 18, 2004, filed a joint Chapter 7…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re Grant CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. LorenzatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Rosenblit v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Pope v. Interbay Funding LLC (In Re Carnes)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API