Legal Opinion
Di Meglio v. Black Condor
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The reply memorandum submitted by the claimant-respondent indicates that it intended to assert a claim against the impleaded-respondent upon an implied contract of indemnity based upon certain provisions of the time charter, including one not incorporated in the petition. However, this is not altogether clear from the allegations of the impleading petition, which almost with equal force suggest a claim for contribution from a joint tort-feasor — the type of claim disallowed in Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 U.S. 282,1 72 S.Ct. 277, 96 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Read v. United States. United States Maritime Commission v. Williams Appeal of VassilopoulusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Barber S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Quinn Bros.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Di Meglio v. The Black CondorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954