Legal Opinion

In Re Wiley

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1997No. 96-BG-751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge.

Petitioner, Richard Wiley, was disbarred in Maryland on November 18, 1993, for obtaining client funds under false pretenses. This court disbarred Wiley pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11(c), which requires reciprocal discipline, and independently on the grounds that Wiley had been convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude, a circumstance requiring disbarment pursuant to D.C.Code § 11-2503 (1995). In re Wiley, 666 A.2d 68 (D.C.1995) (per curiam). Wiley’s disbarment became effective on June 21, 1994, when he filed his affidavit in accordance with Rule XI, § 14(g). On…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re WileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re HuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. In Re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API