International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Federal Forge, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This action arose from a termination of health insurance benefits by Defendant in connection with the closing of its Federal Division plant in Lansing, Michigan. Plaintiffs contend that retired employees, their eligible dependents and spouses and eligible surviving dependents and spouses, have a vested contractual right to the insurance benefits pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement and employee welfare benefit plan. In a four count Complaint, they seek to enforce this right. Counts I, II and III allege a violation of § 301 of the Labor Management…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- Smith v. ABS Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1986
- Helwig v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Alday v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 2008
- Nitzsche v. Stein, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.