Legal Opinion

Frankfurth v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1981No. BAP No. CC-81-1038-VGH, Bankruptcy No. SA 80-01682 PE, Adv. No. SA 80-0860PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOLINN, Bankruptcy Judge.

I

The appellant, James A. Frankfurth, is a licensed real estate broker. The appellee, Melvin B. Cummins, is a real estate developer who filed a Chapter 11 proceeding on July 1,1980. Cummins, as debtor-in-possession, executed, in September, 1980, written exclusive listing agreements with respect to two parcels of real estate, debtor’s principal assets, which provided that if the properties were sold by anyone during the exclusive period, the appellant would be entitled to a commission of 6% of the sale price. These agreements contained the language “subject to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Seatrain Lines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  2. Frankfurth v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  2. DeRonde v. Shirley (In Re Shirley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Frankfurth v. Cummins (In Re Cummins)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Glick v. Brogan (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  5. In Re Crest Mirror and Door Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API