Legal Opinion
Winfield National Bank v. McWilliams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 7, 1900PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error from the District Court of Kay County; before; B. T. Hainer, District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Burwbll, J.:
On the 17th day of October, 1895, the defendant in error, Bettie McWilliams, was the owm-s* and holder of a check on the Richmond National Bank, of Richmond, Kentucky, for the sum of $405, and on that date she took the check to the Farmers and ’■Merchants Bank, of Blackwell, Oklahoma, and there de-. posited it for collection, — endorsed the check in blank, and thereupon the hank paid her the sum of $50 on account of this check, and issued her the following receipt:
“Blackwell, October 17, 1895. “Received from Bettie McWilliams check on Richmond National Bank…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Oddie v. . the Nat. City Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- In re State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Forbes v. First Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Lambert v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gillespie v. First National Bank of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Fidelity Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Beggs Oil Co. v. DeardorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.