Richardson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
Richardson was convicted of possession of dilaudid, a controlled substance, D.C. Code § 33-541(d) (1986 Supp.). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to supress evidence. He first asserts that the United States Park Police officers who arrested him lacked the authority to do so because the arrest took place outside of any federal park or reservation, and that the evidence they seized should therefore be suppressed. Second, he argues that the trial court erred in finding that his seizure by the officers occurred only after he had thrown…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Duhart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Baldwin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- Lawrence v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Reid v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Guadalupe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.