Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific R. R. v. Shimmell

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, First District, Custer County.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

The only questions presented by this appeal are the following, viz.:

1. Does the evidence support the verdict and justify it?

2. Can the property of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company in the territory of Montana, necessary, convenient and usual for running and operating said road, be lawfully seized and sold on execution to satisfy a judgment against said company ?

The property in question is a certain office safe, known as a Diebold combination safe, which was seized on an execution issued out of the probate court of Yellowstone county, and taken from the plaintiff’s depot and station, at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gue v. Tide Water Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Thomas v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Ming v. TruettMontana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Hatcher v. Toledo, Wabash & Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Stewart v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ackroyd v. Winston Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Ackroyd v. Winston Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. Dobbins v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Dobbins v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API