Legal Opinion
Rossiter v. Pitt
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 8, 1955No. 35919PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
A judgment sustaining any or all demurrers to a petition and allowing time for amendment is not subject to exception or review. Code § 81-1001 as amended (Ga. L. 1952, p. 243; Aiken v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 88 Ga. App. 131 (76 S. E. 2d 141); Cates v. Owens, 87 Ga. App. 270 (73 S. E. 2d 345); Community Theatres Co. v. Burney, 87 Ga. App. 165 (73 S. E. 2d 104); Barron v. Foster, 87 Ga. App. 119 (73 S. E. 2d 102); Thornton v. Courvoisier, 90 Ga. App. 26 (81 S. E. 2d 842). The amendment of 1953 to Code § 81-1001 (Ga. L. 1953, p. 82), did not change this rule. Adams v. Ricks, 91 Ga. App.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Cates v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Aiken v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Barron v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Community Theatres Co. v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Lax v. Hospital Authority Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957