Legal Opinion
McGrath v. Nolan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1936No. 7946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant filed a libel in personam against Michel Nolan, alleging that he, Nolan, was employed to pilot the motor-ship Childar and that by reason of his negligence as such pilot in crossing the Columbia river bar, the ship grounded on Peacock Spit, and that as a result of the impact the appellant Patrick E. McGrath, who was a seaman on board the motor-ship, was seriously injured, for which injuries he claims damages in the sum of $50,000. The libel alleges that the respondents other than Nolan, and other than certain surety companies who were also joined, were members…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- The OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Everest & Jennings, Inc. v. E & J Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Port of Seattle v. M/V MARIA RUBICONDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1975
- General v. Pilots' Ass'n for Bay & River DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1966
- Gordon Westergren, Sandy Westergren, Richard Helmle, Carole Helmle, Chris Miller, Kimberly Miller, Peter Sundt, and Brian Johnson v. Houston Pilots Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.