Legal Opinion

Harriman v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 23, 1975No. Civ. A. 4721PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

The instant case involves a challenge by several shareholders of E. I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company (“Du Pont”) to a contemplated merger between Du Pont and Christiana Securities Company (“Christiana”), a closed-end non-diversified management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seq. The plaintiffs, suing derivatively on Du Pont’s behalf seek, on three grounds, to enjoin the merger. They argue that the proposed merger will, when consummated, violate Delaware law because it is unfair to public…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Harry Lewis v. Al KnutsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  4. Brick v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1977
  5. Rifkin v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API