Lumber Co. v. . Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, C. J., concurring in part; ALLEN, J., concurring. The case agreed substantially sets forth these facts: The Dover Lumber Company, a corporation, owned certain rights to cut standing timber upon the lands of the West estate, situated within the Moseley Creek Drainage District. The timber was conveyed to plaintiff, with the privilege of removing it within a stipulated period, prior to the formation of the drainage district.
When the district was formed the plaintiff was not made a party nor served with summons, neither was the particular timber or the plaintiff referred to anywhere in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- McMullen v. State ex rel. KendleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Kinnie v. BareMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Banks v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Curran v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lewis v. Delinquent LandsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Wood v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928