Legal Opinion

Curran v. County of Sibley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Plaintiff brought this action in the district court for Sibley county praying that a pretended lien of $413.52 charged upon his land by the county board for part of the cost of constructing a ditch, be adjudged void for want of jurisdiction of the board in the particulars •considered in the opinion. The action was tried by Baxter, J., (acting for the judge of the 8th district,) who ordered judgment for plaintiff, which was entered, and the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The proceedings, the validity of which are here involved, purported to have been had under the provisions of chapter 97, Laws 1887. Section 8 of this act provides that, on the report of the viewers being filed, the county auditor shall “cause a notice to be given by publication for three successive weeks in a newspaper printed and published in said county, and by posting printed copies thereof in three public places in each township where the proposed work (ditch) is located, and one at the door of the court-house in said county, of the pendency of said petition, and of the time set for the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gourd v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Lager v. County of SibleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. In Re Town Ditch No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Town of Dovray v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API