Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Blatchley

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Broome county. Action by Frances E. Stuart against Ambrose Blatchley and others. From an interlocutory judgment overruling a demurrer to certain portions of the answer of defendants Silas P. Brown and another defendant, Nellie V. Watson and another appeal. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtMerwin, J.

This action is brought for the partition of two par-complaint it is alleged that the plaintiff, as the devisee of Ruth Ann Blatchley Marvin, is the owner of an undivided one-third interest in the first parcel and an undivided two-ninths interest in the second parcel. It is also alleged that Hortensius Blatchley, at the time of his death, in December, 1887, was the owner of an undivided one-third interest in the first parcel and an undivided five-ninths interest in the second parcel, and that the defendants Silas P. Brown and James E. Kent claim to own such interests by virtue of a deed from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. De Witt v. SwiftNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Furshpin v. Monticello Co-operative Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. Slocum v. SlocumNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Stokes v. Ottoman American Development Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Albright v. Trinity Presbyterian ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API