Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Slocum

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action to annul a marriage. Demurrer to answer.

1Opinion of the CourtFobbes, J.

This is an action to annul a marriage, under sections 1743, 1744, Code of Civil Procedure, brought by the plaintiff, the mother of one of the contracting parties, against the defendant, the other contracting party.

The answer sets up a counterclaim, alleging the infidelity of *144the plaintiff’s son, and defendant asks for an absolute divorce for principal cause. To this defense the plaintiff demurs and states as grounds that this subdivision of said answer “ does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense.” Second, that said answer is not sufficient in law to constitute a defense. This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuart v. BlatchleyNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Stewart v. BlatchleyNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington Capitols Basketball Club, Inc. v. BarryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969
  2. Wood v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Russell v. CaseboltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API