Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Fletcher v. Graham

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2006No. 2005-SC-1009-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part opinion by

Justice SCOTT.

I concur wholly with Justice Johnstone’s Opinion of the Court, except as to the *404Governor’s constitutional power to appoint Special Justices. I write separately, however, regarding the permissible scope of the grand jury report, and to distinguish between individuals indicted before the issuance of the pardon, those indicted after the pardon (amnesty), and those granted amnesty and who will not be indicted.1

In the opinion of the court, we state that “[bjecause the Governor has conceded at oral argument that it is the prerogative…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Democratic Party of Kentucky v. GrahamKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bowling v. SinnetteKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Greenwell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API