St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Williams
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee recovered a judgment against the appellant railway company to compensate a personal injury sustained by her. The circumstances of the injury were as follows: She was walking between the main line, and a sidetráek at a point where there is a sharp curve. No road or street crossed the tracks near the place of her injury. The main line track was the outer one, and there were seven or more cars on the curve of the sidetrack, which ran parallel with the main line track, and at the usual distance from it. A person could have stood in the space intervening between the cars on the sidetrack…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. DeQueen & Eastern RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. McClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
3Cited by19 opinions
- General Motors Corporation v. TateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Missouri Pac. Rd. Co. v. Ross, Admr.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Landis v. HastingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. CapleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. PaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.