Legal Opinion

Burns v. Swift

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1816PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error. ERROR to the Common Pleas of Mifflin county, in ejectment. cited, 2 Smith's Laws, 160, 161, 162. 164. 179. Cox v. Ewing,(a) Pig v. Neville.(b) Edie v. Falkner.(c) Holmes v. Hay.(d) 5 Binn. 77. 1 Johns. 158. 2 Johns. 234. 10 Johns. 477. Davis v. Beaty.(e) 1 Harr. & M'Henry, 151. 1 Bay. 30. 4 Dall. 403.

1Opinion of the Court

Tilghman C. J.

John W. Swift and others, the plaintiffs below, claimed under an application in the name of Samuel Cadwallader Morris, dated 1st August, 1766, for 200 acres of land, on which a survey of 213 acres and 8-10ths of an acre, was made on the 27th June, 1767, and returned March 10, 1768. The land lies in Kiskacoquillas settlement, west of the river Susquehanna, and has not been patented. The defendant claims under an application in the name of Thomas Evans, dated 17th August, 1767, “for 300 acres, including a “ small improvement adjoining John Cox and John M'Gee, “ on Ferguson’s run,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Koiner v. Rankin's heirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  2. Miller v. ShawSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1821
  3. Mickle v. LucasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823
  4. Waggoner v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  5. Koiner v. Rankin's heirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API