Legal Opinion

Arine v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 1, 1926No. 4669PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCAMANT, Circuit Judge.

Defendant reserved an exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict, interposed at the close of the government’s ease. The government offered proof of the inventory value of defendant’s merchandise on January 2, 1924, and of the purchases made by him during the year. From this total there was deducted the amount of his sales during the year, as listed in his books, and the inventory value of his stock when a receiver took possession, October 27, 1924. These figures showed a shortage of $26,184.41. There was further evidence that towards the end of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Sturgis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alexander Bisno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. J. A. Herzog v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Wilkes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Foshay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Osborne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API