Legal Opinion

Stereo Gema, Inc. v. Magnadyne Corp.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided September 23, 1996No. Civil 95-1484(HL)PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LAFFITTE, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Magnadyne Corporation’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(3). Magnadyne is a California corporation that imports and distributes car alarms. Plaintiff Stereo Gema (“Gema”) is a Puerto Rico corporation that bought and distributed Magnadyne’s products in Puerto Rico. Gema brings this action for damages under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 1 Puerto Rico’s anti-monopoly laws, 2 breach of contract, and the Puerto Rico Dealers’ Act, 3 commonly known as “Law 75.” Gema alleges jurisdiction both on the basis of a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Silva v. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Soto v. STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Outek Caribbean Distributors, Inc. v. Echo, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
  5. Renaissance Marketing, Inc. v. Monitronics International, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API