Legal Opinion
Public Citizen v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2009No. 07-71868, 07-72555PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge THOMAS.
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:
Petitioners Public Citizen, Inc., San Luis Obispo Mothers For Peace, the State of New York,1 and amicus State of California (“Petitioners”) challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (“NRC” or “Commission”) modification of the Design Basis Threat (“DBT”) rule and partial denial of the Committee to Bridge the Gap’s (“CBG”) petition for rulemaking. Petitioners claim the Commission acted arbitrarily *918and capriciously and contrary to law by refusing to include the threat of air attacks in the final revised DBT…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. CokeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Earth Island Institute v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Defense of Animals v. U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Fbme Bank Ltd. v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Friends Animals v. SilveyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2018
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.