Legal Opinion
Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Zandstra
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 8, 1990No. C-89-1258 WWSPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SCHWARZER, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory relief, brought by a Maryland insurance company, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (“Fidelity”), which seeks a declaration that it has no duty to defend or indemnify the defendants, John Zandstra, Robert Seder-strom, Jr. and Richard Webster (collectively, “the Zandstra defendants”), citizens of California and Washington, against two actions originally brought against them by Homestate Savings and Loan Association (“Homestate”) and now being maintained by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Finci v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Sphinx International, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Level 3 Communications, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company and Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- W Holding Company, Inc. v. AIG Insurance Company - PuertoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. BakerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.