Legal Opinion

Husband v. Aldrich

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 6, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

The plaintiff, a tenant in common of land, seeks partition thereof in equity. The plaintiff’s husband built a house upon a part of the land, and the plaintiff seeks by this bill to have that part assigned to her, without including the value of the building in the partition. The Gen. Sts. c. 136, § 1, which reenacted earlier statutes, — Rev. Sts. c. 103; Sts. 1783, c. 41; 1785, c. 62, § 2;—provided that “persons holding lands as joint tenants, coparceners, or tenants in common, may be compelled to divide the same, either by writ of partition at the common law or in the manner provided in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. HusbandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Chandler v. SimmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. Ward's HeirsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Hurley v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Moseley v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Clough v. CromwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Hallowell v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API