Legal Opinion
Fussell v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 14, 2021No. 2:20-cv-03474Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MELISSA FUSSELL, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 20-3474 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ET AL. SECTION: “J” (1) ORDER & REASONS Before the Court is a Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (Rec. Doc. 28) filed by Defendants, Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Defendants”). The motion is opposed (Rec. Doc. 29) by Plaintiffs Melissa Fussell and Clinton Fussell (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Having considered the motion and legal memoranda, the record, and the applicable law, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Beavers v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.